SO2-Трета част

Тук е мястото за дискусии, коментари и проблеми относно елексира наречен ВИНО

Модератори: dcv, ilu6a

SO2-Трета част

Мнениеот vinoirakia » Нед Юли 11, 2010 7:19 am

15. Removing Free SO2
Sometimes excessive SO2 is (accidentally) added to a wine. SO2 will slowly deplete during an oxidative ageing process, but sometimes winemakers wish to reduce the SO2 level in a short period of time. In any case, desulphiting may inevitably result in loss of aroma/flavour [Weger, 1956] and overdosing should be avoided at all costs. There are three methods commonly employed for such situations, and a fourth potential method.

15.1. Blending
Blending the high-SO2 wine with another wine low in SO2 is the safest method, ensuring the wine does not suffer from oxidation or further processing.

15.2. Aeration
SO2 is often removed from wine by aerating. This is based on the slow oxidation of the SO2 and is only really suitable for slightly excessive doses of SO2, since excessively high doses will not be successfully stripped by even multiple aerations.
Usually the wine is transferred from one vessel to another in a violent manner (with turbulence) to encourage oxygen contact. This method can be traumatic for a wine, potentially over-oxidising and "damaging" its delicacy. However, it remains a simple solution to reducing excessive SO2. A wine saturated with oxygen will contain 5-8 mg/l oxygen (see section "SO2 and Oxidation, Saturation level" above). Assuming a complete reaction (though somewhat chemically unrealistic), this amount of oxygen may remove 20-32 mg/l SO2. If the aim is to reduce SO2 by over 20-32 mg/l then this method can be used on a periodic basis more than once (with several days between successive operations). If the aim is to reduce the SO2 by less that 20 mg/l, the aerating should be done with less violence.

15.3. Hydrogen Peroxide
15.3.1. Theory
Free SO2 can be removed by adding hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to wine. The use of H2O2 is considered too severe by many. Nevertheless, it remains one of the only real options for removing excessively high levels of SO2 from wine for the non-commercial winemaker.

The removal reaction is:
SO2 + H2O2 ===> SO4-- + 2H+

The molecular weight of SO2 is 64.1 and that of H2O2 is 34. Therefore, 0.5304 g (1/64.1*34) of H2O2 is required to react with 1 g of SO2.

The peroxide reacts with molecular SO2, changing the SO2 equilibrium. Since this equilibrium is continually re-establishing, the H2O2 should be added slowly. Additionally, since H2O2 is such a powerful oxidiser, the amount added should be calculated carefully. Analytically testing the SO2 content before and after H2O2 addition is advised.

Solutions of H2O2 commonly come as 3% solutions. If they are mass/mass solutions (this appears to be the typical case) they should contain about 30.3 mg/ml H2O2. If they are volume/volume solutions they should contain about 42.3 mg/ml H2O2. (See "Information on H2O2 content" below for more details.)
15.3.2. Example using H2O2
15 litres of wine has a free SO2 level of 70 mg/l. It is desired to reduce this to 40 mg/l. The reduction of 30 mg/l (70-40) requires an H2O2 addition of 16 mg/l (0.5304*30). Thus, the 15 litres requires an addition of 240 mg (15*16) of H2O2. Using a 3% mass/mass solution of H2O2, 7.9 ml (240/30.3) of the solution needs to be added to the 15 litres for the drop to 40 mg/l.

15.3.3. Information on H2O2 content
Pure (100%/weight) H2O2 has a density of about 1.41 g/ml.
Mass/mass solutions: 3 g H2O2 / (97 g H2O + 3 g H2O2) means a volume of 97 ml + (3 g / 1.41 g/ml = 2.13 ml) = 99.1 ml. This contains 3 g per 99.1 ml which is 30.3 mg H2O2/ml of the 3% solution.
Volume/volume solutions: 3 ml H2O2 / (97 ml H2O + 3 ml H2O2). 3 ml H2O2 provides (3 ml * 1.41 g/ml =) 4.23 g H2O2 per 100 ml solution, which is 42.3 mg H2O2/ml of the 3% solution.

15.4. Inert Gas Stripping
This technique is used to remove SO2 from large-scale commercial fruit juices. On a small scale, it might be done by sparging a receiving vessel with CO2 (or nitrogen or argon). The wine is then sprayed against the vessel wall in an attempt to volatise the SO2. Alternatively, bubbling inert gas through the wine might be practised. The effectiveness of this method is, however, questionable without the use of sophisticated equipment.

16. Adding SO2: Practical Considerations
When adding SO2, it is important to ensure that it is evenly distributed in the must or wine. Injecting SO2 solution steadily (rather than in a single hit) during pumping/transfer/racking procedures presents an ideal method of homogenous SO2 addition.
Due to the rapid enzymatic oxidation reactions in musts, SO2 ought to be in contact with the juice as soon as possible after crushing the fruit. This is the principal which should be followed in any SO2 additions to musts. Exactly how this is practised may vary from set-up to set-up. In the case where fruit is partially crushed upon harvesting, SO2 should be added to the fruit with the aim to take action within the juice resulting from partial crushing.
Addition of SO2 to the uncrushed fruit in the case of reds, or crushed and unpressed fruit in the case of whites, will result in SO2 binding with fruit solids. Such binding should be accounted for, and higher SO2 additions may be required in such situations.
Oxidation of draining press juice will be significant in the absence of SO2 and SO2 might therefore be added to the marc of the post-free run press fraction. Delteil [2001] argues that this practise results in increased aromatics and varietal expression, greater palate volume and decreased sensations of palate dryness.

Post crush additions in a liquid form are recommended, since they assist in SO2 distribution and help prevent combination with solids. SO2 is most effective when added to individual portions of the must during, or within quick succession of, pressing (or crushing, in the case of reds). This method presents a more effective use of SO2 than a number of consecutive additions to must storage vessels (e.g. must receptacle tanks/vessels).

High point-concentrations of SO2 indicate that SO2 has not been mixed thoroughly. In practise, this can sometimes be seen in crushed fruit or fresh must as a localised discolouration of the pomace or juice. Figure 11 shows this phenomenon.

According to some, adding small concentrations of SO2 to must sequentially results in more oxidation than would occur in an unsulphited juice. Additionally, SO2 doses are more effective on yeast and microbes if the dose is given as a single high dose, rather than a number of small sequential doses.

Since a portion of any previously added SO2 is in the bound form and therefore not effective, SO2 solutions used for additions should be relatively dilute.
After fermentation, corrective SO2 additions should only be made under conditions of potential contamination or volatilisation (e.g. during transfer or under high temperatures) or when molecular SO2 levels are far from the required effective dose.
17. Typical SO2 Additions
Winemakers who add SO2 pre-fermentation typically add around 25-50 mg/l at crush. This is followed by a post alcoholic fermentation (or post malolactic fermentation) addition sufficient to, having accounted for binding, maintain the desired molecular SO2 level. (Some estimate this as 120-150% of the amount required to maintain the desired molecular SO2 level.) During bulk ageing, and for bottling, the wine is maintained at this same molecular SO2 level.
As mentioned previously, molecular SO2 levels are pH dependent. However, many winemakers cannot assess pH in their wines and, therefore, quantities of total SO2 to add at particular times or procedures of winemaking are made based on rough guidelines. Exact quantities vary from winemaker to winemaker (and on wine type/style and set-up). However, dosages can be amplified or reduced depending on the circumstances surrounding the quality of the fruit, juice, and wine. For fruit and musts, the following situations will require increased SO2 dosages: high suspended solids, ruptured/diseased fruit, violent or prolonged fruit transport, increased handling, higher temperatures, or a longer duration between crush and fermentation. For wines, increased temperatures and increased exposure to air tend to call for increased SO2 dosages. At bottling, wine style and the intended duration of ageing dominate dosage decisions.

It is worth noting that, because of the differences in environmental conditions and typical practises in different countries, typical additions vary among different countries and regions. The additions in France, for example, are often much higher than what is considered necessary or normal in California. Likewise, hotter climates tend to receive higher doses (e.g. Languedoc Roussillon vs Burgundy). Common SO2 levels for addition to must are presented in Table 4 and levels for addition to wines are presented in Table 5. Note that these values are not the dosage additions themselves, but are the quantity of free SO2 that should exist in the must/wine after addition (binding should be taken into account upon addition to ensure that these levels are met). Table 6 shows recommended maximum values of total SO2. On an international scale, these values are relatively conservative.

(For typical Campden tablet additions, see the Campden Tablets section below.)

Table 4. Recommended free SO2 levels for musts
Circumstance Free SO2 (mg/l)
white, healthy fruit, low pH 25-50
white, healthy fruit, high pH 60-80
white, fruit with some rot 80-100
red, healthy fruit, low pH 50
red, healthy fruit, high pH 50-80
red, fruit with some rot 80-100

Table 5. Recommended free SO2 levels for wine
Circumstance Free SO2 (mg/l)
before MLF none / under 20
dry white, maintenance 30-40
sweet white, maintenance 40-80
red, maintenance 20-40
dry white, bottling 20-30
sweet white, bottling 30-50
red, bottling 10-30

The range in the values corresponds to the pH of the wine. If the wine is an acidic style the lower values should be used, whilst the higher values should be used for less acidic wines. Wines which will be travelling or stored in unfavourable conditions often have 1.5 to 2 times the bottling values above (Table 5) added at bottling.

Table 6. Recommended total SO2 levels for wine
white (conservative) under 150
red (conservative) under 150
white, dry (liberal) under 200
white, white (liberal) under 400
red (liberal) under 300

It is sometimes claimed that SO2 additions without reference to pH is sufficient. Whilst this is generally true, there are exceptions. Figure 13 shows three different levels of free SO2 (20, 30, and 50 mg/l) and their corresponding molecular SO2 levels at varying pHs. Assuming that molecular SO2 must be kept below the sensory threshold (2 mg/l) and above 0.8 mg/l for microbial stability (see Section 6), then "safe zones" are molecular SO2 levels between these two values (i.e. 0.8-2 mg/l). It can be seen from the figure that these zones still vary over the typical pH values encountered in wine. For example, whilst 30 mg/l free SO2 is sufficient for pH values ranging 3.0 to 3.4, it is not suitable for pHs outside this range (below this level it is above sensory threshold, above this level it is below levels suitable for microbial stability). Based on this information, it might be suggested that red wines (which typically have a pH > 3.2) be kept around 50 mg/l free SO2 and white wines (which typically have a pH < 3.3) be kept above 30 but below 50 mg/l free SO2. Of course, awareness of the pH is always preferable to such estimates.
18. Storage and Purity
Dry sulphur dioxide (in the metabisulphite form, or otherwise) is sensitive to high temperatures and humidity. It will lose its strength under such conditions. It is important to replace SO2 stores reasonably frequently.

Additionally, the strength of SO2 is sometimes weak upon purchase. For example, upon making up an aqueous solution of metabisulphite and testing its SO2 concentration, it is not uncommon to find only 90% of the expected SO2 value present. This is most likely due to the conditions experienced by the SO2 prior to purchase. It is therefore important to check the strength of the SO2 stock being used for winemaking additions.
19. Stock Solutions
Stock solutions of dissolved sodium or potassium metabisulphite salts provide a fast and simple way of adding sulphite to a wine. This is especially the case when a gram scale is not available and measuring a volume of stock solution is preferential to weighing out very small quantities of powder.

It is important to keep a stock solution in an air tight container since contact with air will decompose the sulphite. (It should also be noted that plastic is breathable to some extent, and stock solutions stored in plastic bottles should therefore be remade relatively frequently.)

As an example of the calculations used in making and using a stock solution, a 10% stock solution can be made up by adding enough water to 100 grams of potassium metabisulphite to make up a total volume of 1 litre (100 grams / 1000 mls * 100 = 10%). This solution contains 100 mg/ml of potassium metabisulphite. Since potassium metabisulphite is only 57.6% SO2, this solution then contains 5.76% SO2 (10% * 0.576 = 5.76%) or, alternatively stated, it contains 57.6 mg/ml of SO2 (100 mg/ml * 0.576 = 57.6 mg/ml).
10 ml of this 10% stock solution added to 20 litres gives 50 mg/l of potassium metabisulphite (100 mg/ml * 10 ml / 20 L = 50 mg/l) which gives 28.8 mg/l of SO2 (50 mg/l * 0.576).
Alternatively, to obtain 30 mg/l of SO2 in 15 litres, this requires 781 mg of potassium metabisulphite (30 mg/l * 15 l / 0.576 = 781 mg) for which 7.8 ml of the 10% stock solution is required (450 mg / 100 mg/ml / 57.6 % SO2 = 4.5 / 0.576 = 7.81 ml).

20. Campden Tablets
Campden tablets are designed to have a mass of 0.44 grams. However, consistency of the tablet size in manufacturing is questionable, and many winemakers claim there is little certainty that tablets contain the amount of metabisulphite they are intended to (expected concentrations have been seen to deviate by up to 25%). Additionally, some winemakers claim that the "fillers" used in Campden tablets to increase the bulk size of the tablet, taint wine flavour and affect clarity. Nevertheless, Campden tablets remain a simple way of adding a small (if rough) quantity of sulphite to a must or wine.

Rules of thumb for the use of Campden tablets are generally quoted as:
One tablet should be added per gallon (Imperial or US) initially and then one at each of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc rackings.
Or, if heat is used in preparing the must, none initially but one per gallon at each of the 1st, 3rd, 5th, etc rackings.

Assuming one Campden tablet contains 0.44 grams of potassium/sodium metabisulphite, the following sulphite levels are obtained by the addition of 1 tablet to the given volumes:
Table 7. SO2 Equivalent Campden Tablet Dosages
Salt per Imperial gallon per US gallon per litre
Sodium 65 mg/l 78 mg/l 297 mg/l
Potassium 56 mg/l 67 mg/l 254 mg/l

In practise, these figures may vary by up to 25%, possibly more.

21. Sulphur Wicks and Rings
Sulphur wicks or rings are usually comprised of cellulose coated sulphur or a mineral (aluminium or calcium silicate) mixed with sulphur. They are generally only used for dosing barrels or small wooden tanks. They are not recommended for use in concrete tanks or stainless steel, due to the subsequent chemical attack on the surfaces of these vessels.

Sulphur wicks and rings are heterogeneous and their exact SO2 content varies due to the manufacturing process and storage conditions (again, humidity reduces their effectiveness) [Chatonnet et al., 1993]. Sulphur rings are more sensitive to storage conditions than wicks.

In theory, the burning of a sulphur wick or ring follows the reaction:
S + O2 ===> SO2

However, in reality around 20-30% of the sulphur is lost due to (1) part of the sulphur falling from the wick before it burns and (2) part of the sulphur producing sulphuric acid. In an enclosed space like a barrel, the amount of sulphur which can be burnt is limited by the presence of sulphurous gas which inhibits combustion. For example, in a 225 litre barrel around 20 g of sulphur is the limit which can be burnt. In addition to this, humid barrels hinder combustion. In general, 5 g of sulphur burnt in a 225 litre barrel will increase the SO2 by 10-20 mg/l (by burning a sulphur ring) or by 10 mg/l (by burning a sulphur wick) [Chatonnet et al., 1993].

SO2 is not usually distributed evenly during the filling of sulphured barrels, nor does it homogenise well afterwards. A thorough mixing is therefore recommended after barrel filling (e.g. by rolling the barrel).

22. Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dr. John Danilewicz for his assistance in accurately describing the reactions regarding the oxidation of wine in the presence of sulphur dioxide. There is much debate with regards to the theories expounded in the literature in this area and Dr. Danilewicz's cutting edge input in this area is much appreciated.
Additionally, the author would like to thank Lum Eisenman for his communication of AO and Ripper test data results.

23. References
Amano, Y., Kubota, M., and Kagami, M. (1979). Oxygen uptake of Koshu grape must and its control. Hokkokogaku Kaishi 57:92-101.
Amerine, M.A. and Joslyn, M.A. (1951). Table wines; the tech. of their prod. Berkley and LA, Univ. Cal. Press.
Beech, F.W., Burroughs, L.F., Timberlake, C.F., and Whiting, G.C. (1979). Progres recents sur l'aspect chimique et antimicrobienne de l'anhydride sulfureux. Bulletin OIV 52(586):1001-1022.
Berg, H.W. and Akiyoshi, M. (1962). Color behavior during fermentation and aging of wines. Am. J. Enol.Vitic. 13:126-132.
Berg, H.W., Filipello, F., Hinreiner, E., and Webb, A.D. (1955). Evaluation of threshold and minimum difference concentrations for various constiuents of wines: I. Water solutions of pure substances. Food Tech. 9:23-26.
Biedermann, W. (1956). Oxidation in fruits and fruit juices. Mitt. Lebensmittelunters. Hyg. 47, 86-112. (German).
Bioletti, F.T. (1912). Sulfurous acid in winemaking. 8th Int. Cong. Appl. Chem. 14:31-59.
Blouin, J. (1963). Constituants du vin combinant de l'acide sulfureux. Ann. Technol. Agr. 12 (numйro hors sйrie 1):97-98.
Blouin, J (1966). Contribution a l'edute des combinaytions de l'anhydride sulfureux dans les mouts et les vins. Ann. Technol. Agr. 25:223-287, 360-401.
Braverman, J.B.S. (1963). Introduction to the Biochemistry of Foods. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Co.
Breeden, D.C. (1999). Comparison of Chemetrics Titrets to Regular Ripper, rec.crafts.winemaking Usenet newsgroup thread, 23/06/1999.
Breeden, D.C. (2002a). SO2 Titrette Accuracy. rec.crafts.winemaking Usenet newsgroup thread, 2002-03-14.
Breeden, D.C. (2002b). too much sulfite. rec.crafts.winemaking Usenet newsgroup thread, 2002-02-10.
Breeden, D.C. (2003). SO2 in wine. rec.crafts.winemaking Usenet newsgroup thread, 2003-08-26.
Buechsenstein, J.W. and Ough, C.S. (1978). SO2 determination by aeration-oxidation: a comparison with Ripper. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 29, 161.
Burroughs, L.F. (1975). Determining free sulfur dioxide in red wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 26:25-29.
Burroughs, L.F. and Sparks, A.H. (1973a). Sulphite-binding power of wines and ciders. I. Equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonyl bisulphite compounds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 24:187-198.
Burroughs, L. and Sparks, A.H. (1973b). Sulphite-binding power of wines and ciders. I. Equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonyl bisulphite compounds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 24:187-198.
Burroughs, L. and Sparks, A.H. (1973c). Sulphite-binding power of wines and ciders. III. Determination of carbonyl compounds in a wine and calculation of its sulphite-binding power. J. Sci. Food Agric. 24:207-217.
Burroughs, L. and Whiting, G. 1960. The sulphur dioxide combining power of cider. Ann. Rept. Agr. Hort. Exper. Stat. Long Ashton 1960:144-147.
Chatonnet P., Boidron, J.N, and Dubourdieu, D. (1993). J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 27 (4), 277-298.
Cheynier, V., Rigaud, J., Souquet, J.M., Duprat, F. and Moutounet, M. (1989). Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 40:1, 36-42.
Cruess, W.V. (1912.) The effect of sulfurous acid on fermentation organisms. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 4:581-585.
Danilewicz, J.C. (2003). Review of Reaction Mechanisms of Oxygen and Proposed Intermediate Reduction Products in Wine: Central Role of Iron and Copper. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 54(2):73-85.
Delfini, C. (1981). La stabilizzazione microbiologica in enologia mediante l'impiego dell'anidride solforosa: nuovi (o vecchi?) concetti. L'Enotecnico, 10:27-33; 11:32-33. Ann. Ist. Sper. Enologia, Asti, 12:239-250.
Delfini, C. (1984). Prove sperimentali sulla dose minima di SO2 necessaria per mutizzare un mosto. L'Enotecnico, 1:51-57.
Delfini, C. (1988). Refermentation potential in Bottled Sweet Wines of Yeasts Adpated to Sulfur Dioxide. Chem. Mikrobiol. Technol. Lebensm. 11:137-142. Delfini, C. (1989). Ability of wine malolactic bacteria to produce histamine. Sciences des Aliments, 9:413-416.
Delfini, C. (1992). Criteri metodologici seguiti, risultati ottenuti e prospetitive nella selezione di lieviti per uso enologico. Biologia Oggi, VI (1-2):303-309.
Delfini, C. and Morsiani, M.G. (1992). Study on the resistance to sulfur dioxide of malolactic strains of Lueconostoc oenos and Lactobaccillus sp. isolated from wines. Science des Aliments, 12:493-511.
Delteil, D. (2001). Mastering SO2 during the pre-fermentation phases of white wine-making. ICV Flashinfo, available at, September.
Dittrich, H.H. and Staudenmayer, T. (1968). SO2-Bildung, Bцckserbeseitigung. D Weinztg 104:707-709.
Dott, W., Heinzel, M., Trьper, H.G. (1976). Sulfite formation by wine yeasts: I. Relationship between growth, fermentation and sulfite formation. Archives of Microbiology 107, 289-292.
du Toit, Wessel. (2000). The SO2 resistance of South African acetic acid bacteria and their effect on fermentation. Department of Viticulture and Oenology and the IWBT, University of Stellenbosch work published at
Dubernet, M. and Ribйreau-Gayon, P. (1973). Presence et significance dans les mouts et les vins de la tyrosinase du raisin. Conn. Vigne Vin 7:283-302.
Dubernet, M. and Ribйreau-Gayon, P. (1974). Vitis 13, 233.
Dubourdieu, D. and Lavigne, V. (1990). Rev. Fr. Oenol. 124, 58-61.
Eisenman, L. (2001). Oxygen Uptake in Wine. Available at The Home Winemakers Manual.
Eisenman, L. (2004). Personal communication.
Eschenbruch, R. (1974). Sulfite and sulfide formation during winemaking - a review. Am. J. Enol. and Vitic. 25 (3), 157-161.
Eschenbroch, R. and Bonish, P. (1976). The influence of pH on sulfite formation by yeasts. Arch Microbiol 107:229-231.
Fabre, S. (1998). Objectif 28, March, 21-25.
Farkas, J. (1988). Technology and Biochemistry of Wine, Vols. 1 and 2. Gordon & Breach, New York.
Fornachon. (1963). Inhibition of Certain Lactic Acid Bacteria by Free and Bound Sulfur Dioxide, J. Sci. Food Agr., 14: 857-862.
Harvalia, A. (1965). La couleur des vins rouges. Chim. Chronika (Athens) 20(9):155-159.
Heard, H. and Fleet, G.H. (1988). Austr. NZ Wine Ind. J., 3, 57-60.
Heinzel, M., Dott, W., Trьper, H.G. (1976). Stцrungen im Schwefelstoffwechsel als Ursache der SO2-Bildung durch Weinhefen. Wein-Wiss 31:275-286.
Hennig, K. 1943. Bilans de l'azote dans les moыts et les vins nouveaux en fermentation. Bull. O.I.V. 16(159):82-86.
Hennig, K. and Burkhardt, R. (1960a). Detection of phenolic compounds and hydroxy acids in grapes, wines, and similar beverages. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 11:64-79.
Hennig, K. and Burkhardt, R. (1960b). Vorkommen und Nachweis von Quercitrin und Myricitrin inn Trauben und Wein. Weinberg Keller. 7:1-3.
Hood, A. (1983). Inhibition of growth of wine lactic-acid bacteria by acetaldehyde-bound sulphur dioxide. Aust. Grapegrower & Winemaker 232:34-43.
Hooper, R.L., Collins, G.G., and Rankine, B.C. (1985). Catecholase activity in Australian white grape varieties. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36:203-206.
Ingram, M. (1948). Germicidal effects of free and combines sulfur dioxide. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 67:18-21.
Jackisch, Philip. (1985). Modern Winemaking, Cornell University Press, 1985.
Joslyn, M.A. and Braverman, J.B.S. (1954). The chemistry and technology of the pretreatment and preservation of fruit and vegetable products with sulfur dioxide and sulfites. In Advances in Food Research 5:97-160. New York: Academic Press.
Jurd, L. (1964). Reactions involved in sulfite bleaching of anthocyanins. J. Food. Sci. 29:16-19.
Katchmer, J. (1990). Effects of sulfur dioxide and bisulfite-binding compounds on short term yeast viability in a model wine solution. M.S. thesis, Davis, CA: University of California.
Kefford, J.F., McKenzie, H.A., and Thmopson, P.C.O. (1950). Effect of oxygen on flavor deterioration and loss of ascorbic acid in canned orange juice. Food Preservation Quarterly (Australia). 10, 3, 44-47.
Kelly, M. and Wollan, D. (2003). Micro-oxygenation of wine in barrels. The Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker. 473a:29-32.
Kerp, W. (1903). Ueber organisch gebundene schweflige Saure in Nahrungsmitteln. Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 6:66-68.
Kerp, W. (1904a). Ueber die schweflige Sдure im Wein. I. Allgemeines ьber die schweflige Sдure im Wein. Arb. Gesundheitzamte 21(2):1-15.
Kerp, W. (1904b). Ueber die schweflige Sдure im Wein. II. Allgemeines ьber die aldehydschweflige Sдure im Wein. Arb. Gesundheitzamte 21(2):16-40.
Kerp, W. (1904c). Die schweflige Sдure und ihre Verbindungen mit Aldehyden und Ketonen. I. Teil. Berlin, Julius Springer.
Kerp, W. and Bauer, E. (1904). Zur Kenntnis der gebundenen schwefligen Sauren. I. Arb. Gesundheitsamte. 21:180-185.
Kerp, W. and Bauer, E. (1907a). Zur Kenntnis der gebundenen schwefligen Sauren. II. 26:231-248.
Kerp, W. and Bauer, E. (1907b). Zur Kenntnis der gebundenen schwefligen Sauren. III. 26:269-279.
Kielhцfer, E. (1963). Etat et action de l'acide sulfureuax dans les vins; regles de son emploi. Ann. Technol. Agr. 12:77-89.
Kielhofer, E. and Wьrdig, G. (1960). Die an aldehyd gebundene Schweflige Saure im Wein. I. Acetaldehydbildung durch enzymatische und nicht enzymatische Alkohol-Oxydation. Weinberg Keller 7:16-22.
King, A.D. Jr., Ponting, J.D., Sanshuck, D.W., Jackson, R., and Mihara, K. (1981). Factors affecting death of yeast by sulfur dioxide. J. Food. Prot. 44:92-97.
Kolthoff, I.M. and Stenger, V.A. (1942). Volumetric Analysis Vol. I, Theoretical fundamentals. New York, Interscience Publishers, Inc.
Lafon-Lafourcade, S. and Peynaud, E. (1974). Sur l'action antibacterienne de l'annhydride sulfureux sous forme libre et sous forme comninйe. Conn. Vigne Vin 8:187-203.
Lafourcade, S. (1952). Contribution а l'йtude des activeurs et des inhibiteurs de la fermentation alcoolique des moыts des raisin. Ann. Technol. Agr. 4:5-66.
Lafourcade, S. (1955). Contribution a l'etude des activeurs et des inhibiteurs de la fermentation alcoolique des mouts de raisin. Ann. Technol. Agr. 4:5-66.
Lehmann, F.L. (1987). Secondary fermentations retarded by high levels of free sulfur dioxide. Aust. N.Z. Wine Ind. J. 2, 52-53.
Liu, J.-W.R. and Gallander, J.F. (1982). Effect of insoluble solids on the sulfur dioxide and rate of malolactic fermentation in white table wines. Am. J. Enol. and Vitic. 33, 194-197.
Loeffler, H.J. (1940). Determination of air in citrus juice. Ind. Eng. Chem., Analyt. Ed. 12, 533-534.
Lu Valle, J.E. (1952). The reaction of quinone and sulfite. I. Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74:2970-2977.
Lьthi, H. (1953). Recent analysis of the significance and preservation of oxidative reactions in apple juice. Int. Fruchtsaft-Union. Zeg. (German).
Lьthi, H. (1954). The significance of the oxidation of our fruit juices by enzymes. Schweiz. Ztschr. Obst- und Weinbau, 63, 455, 469, 494. (German).
Lьthi, H. (1960). The determination of some qualitative factors in alcohol-free fruit juices . Flьssges Obst. 25 (4), 16-19. (German).
Macris, B.J. and Markakis, P. (1974). Transport and toxicity of sulphur dioxide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 25,21.
Margalit, Yair. (1990). Winery Technology and Operations, San Francisco: Wine Appreciation Guild Ltd., 1990.
Margalit, Yair. (1996). Concepts in Wine Chemistry, San Francisco: Wine Appreciation Guild Ltd., 1996.
Mayer, K., Vetsch, U., and Pause, G. (1975). Hemmung des biologischen Saurabbaus durch gebundene schweflige Saure. Schw. Z. Obst-Wein. 23:590-596.
Minarik, E. (1978). Progres recents dans la connaisance des phenomenes microbiologiques en vinification. Bull. O.I.V. 51(567):352-367.
Mountonet, M., Mazauric, J.P., Saint-Pierre, B., Hanocq, J.F. (1998). Gaseous Exchange in Wines Stored in Barrels. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnellerie, 4, 131-145.
Mьller-Spдth, H. (1977). Die Weinwirtschaft, 6, 1-12.
Mьller-Spдth, H. (1982). Die Rolle der Kohlensaure beim Stillwein. Weinwirt. 118:1031-1037.
Mьller-Spдth, H. (1988). Objectif 28, March 21-25, 15-19.
Fabre, S. (1998). Objectif 28, March, 21-25.
Osborne, J.P., Mira de Orduсa, R., Pilone, G.J., and Liu, S.-Q. (2000). Acetaldehyde metabolism by wine lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters 191, 51-55.
Ough, C.S. (1959). Personal communication in Amerine et al. (1951).
Ough, C.S. (1985). Some effects of temperature and SO2 on wine during simulated transport or storage. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36:18-22.
Ough, C.S. and Crowell, E.A. (1987). Use of sulfur dioxide in winemaking. J. Food Science 52(2):386-89.
Perscheid, M. and Zurn, F. (1977). Der einfluss von Oxydationsvorgangen auf die Weinqualitat. Weinwirt, 113:10-12.
Peynaud, Emile. (1984). Knowing and Making Wine, english translation 1984, John Wiley & Sons.
Peynaud, E. and Lafon-Lafourcade, S. 1966. Facteurs de la formation des acides pyruvique et alpha-cйtoglutarique au cours de la fermentation alcoolique; consйquences pratiques sur les combinaisons sulfitiques des vins. Ind. Aliment. Agr. (Paris) 83:119-126.
Porchet, B. (1931). Contribution a l'etude de l'adaptation des levures a l'acide sulfureux. Ann. Agr. Suisse. 32(2):135-154.
Poulton, J.R.S. (1970). Chemical protection of wine against oxidation. Die Wynboer 466:July:22-23.
Pulley, G.N. and von Loesecke, H.W. (1939). Gases in the commercial handling of citrus juices. Ind. Eng. Chem. 31, 1275-1278.
Rahn, O. and Conn, J.E. (1944). Effect of increase in acidity on antiseptic efficiency. Ind. Eng. Chem. 36:185-187.
Rankine, B.C. (1966). Sulphur dioxide in wines. Food Technol. Australia. 18:134-135, 137, 139, 141.
Rankine, B.C. (1968). The importance of yeasts in determining the composition and quality of wines. Vitis 7, 22-49.
Rankine, B.C. (1995). Making Good Wine. Pan Macmillan Australia Pty Limited. (First published by The Macmillan Co. of Aust., 1989.)
Rankine, B.C. and Pocock, K.F. (1969). Influence of yeast strain on binding of SO2 in wine and on its formation during fermentation. J. Sci. Food and Agric. 20, 104-109.
Rehm, H.-J. and Wittman, H. (1962.) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der antimikrobiellen Wirkung der schwefligen Saure. I. Uebersicht uber einflussnehmende Faktoren auf die antimikrobiellen Wirkung der schwefligen Saure. Z. Lebensm.-Untersuch. -Forsch. 118:413-429.
Rhem, H.J. (1964). The antimicrobial action of sulphurous acid. In Microbial Inhibitors in Food, Ed. Molin, N. Stockholm, Sweden: Almquist, and Wiksells.
Rhem, H.J., Wallnofer, P., and Wittman, H. (1965). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der antimikrobeillen Wirkung der schwefligen Saure. IV. Dissoziation und antimikrobeille Wirkung einiger Sulfonate. Z. Lebens. Forsch. 127:72-85.
Ribйreau-Gayon et al. 1975. Traite d'Oenologie. Dunod, Paris, Tome 2, 267-269.
Ripper, M. (1892). Schweflige Sдure in Weinen und deren Bestimmung. J Prakt Chem 46:428-473.
Romano, P. and Suzzi, G. (1992). in Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology (ed. G.H. Fleet). Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur. Switzerland.
Romano, P. and Suzzi, G. (1993). Sulfur dioxide and wine microorganisms. In: Fleet, G.H. (Ed.), Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology, Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland, pp. 373-393.
Sayavedra-Soto, L.A. and Montgomery, M.W. (1986). Inhibition of polyphenoloxidase by sulfite. J. Food Sci. 51:1531-1536.
Scardovi, V. (1951). Studi sulla resistenza all'anidride solforosa. Nota I - Annali di Microbiolognia, 4, 131.
Scardovi, V. (1952). L'ibribazione e le mutazioni dei lieviti. IX Congresso Internazionale di Industrie Agrarie, Roma.
Scardovi, V. (1953). Studi sulla resistenza dei lieviti all'anidride solforsa. Influenza del NaHSO3 su alcune funzioni matboliche del ceppo originario e del ceppo assuefatto. Ann. Microbiol. 5:140-161.
Schaeffer, A. 1987. Cold temperature sulfiting and stabilization of wines in Alsace. Vineyard & Winery Management 39, May/June.
Schanderl, H. (1959). Die Mikrobiologie des Mostes und Weines. 2nd Ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Eugen Ulmer.
Schimz, K.-L. (1980). The effect of sulfite on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch. Microbiol. 125:28-95.
Schroeter, L.C. (1966). Sulfur dioxide application in foods, beverages, and parmaceuticals. New York, Pergamon Press.
Singleton, V.L. (1987). Oxygen with phenols and related reactions in musts, wines and model systems: Observations and practical implications. Am. J. Enol. Vitic, 38:69-77.
Singleton, V.L., Zaya, J., and Trousdale, E. (1980). White table wine quality and polyphenol composition as affected by must sulfur dioxide content and pmace contact time. Am. J. Enol. and Vitic. 31(1):14-20.
Sudraud, M. (1977). Trate d'Oenologie. Tome IV.
Sudraud, P. and Chauvet, S. (1985). Activitй antilevure de l'anhydride sulfureux molйculaire. Conn. Vigne Vin. 19, (1) 31-40.
Suzzi, G., Romano, P., Zambonelli, C. (1985). Saccharomyces strain selection in minimizing SO2 requirement during vinification. Am. J. Enol. and Vitic. 36, 199-202.
Tartar, W.V. and Garretson, H.H. (1941). The thermodynamic ionization constants of sulfurous acid at 25 degrees. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 63:808-816.
Timberlake, C.F. and Bridle, P. (1976). Interactions between anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, and acetaldehyde and their significance in red wines. Am. J. Enol. and Vitic. 27:97-105.
Traverso-Rueda, S. and Singleton, V.L. (1973). Catecholase activity in grape juice and its implications in winemaking. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 24:103-109.
Tressler, D. K., et al. (1980). Fruit and Vegetable Juice Processing Technology. AVI Publishing Co. 3rd ed.
Usseglio-Tomasset, L. (1989). Chimie oenologique. Tec and Doc Lavoisier, Paris in Ribйreau-Gayon, P., Dubourdieu, D., Donиche, B., Lonvaud, A. (2000). Handbook of Enology, Volume 1, The Microbiology of Wine and Vinifications, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (English edition), p 183.
Usseglio-Tomasset, L. and Bosia, P.D. (1984.) La prima costante di dissociazione dell'acido solforoso. Vini d'Italia 5, 7-14.
Uzuka, Y. and Nomura, T. (1986). Determination of sulfite resistance in wine yeasts. Proc. 6th Aust. Wine Ind. Tech. Conf., T.H. Lee, Ed., p141-145.
Weger, B. (1956). On desulfiting apple juices. Die Fruchtsaft-Industrie, 5, 212-213.
White, B.B and Ough, C.S. (1973). Oxygen uptake studies on grape juice. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 24:148-152.
Wildenradt, H.L. and Singleton, V.L. (1974). The production of aldehydes as a results of oxidation of polyphenolic compounds and its relation to wine aging. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 25:119-126.
Wьrdig, G. and Schlotter, H.A. (1967). SO2-Bildung in Gдrenden Traubenmosten. Z.Lebensm.-Untersuch.-Forsch. 134:7-13.
Yang, H.Y. (1975). Effect of sulfur dioxide on the activity of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 26:1.
Zang, K. and Franzen, K. (1966). Schweflige-Saure-Bildung im Verlauf der Traubenmost-Garung. Deut. Wein-Ztg. 102:128,130.
Zang, K. and Franzen, K. (1967). Bildung von schwefligen Sдure bei der Weinbereitung und ihre mцglichen Ursachen. Deut. Wein-Ztg. 102:128, 130.
Zoecklein, B., Fugelsang, K.C., Gump, B.H., and Nury, F.S. (1990). Production Wine Analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Zoecklein, B. (2005). Enology Notes # 101. April 20, 2005.
Zoecklein, B. (2001). Enology Notes #26, August 29, 2001.
Zoecklein, B. (2000). Harvest Memo #4, September 27, 2000.
Прикачени файлове
SO2-treta chast.doc
(97.5 KiB) 1780 пъти
Мнения: 363
Регистриран на: Сря Фев 28, 2007 12:29 pm
Местоположение: Пловдив

Назад към Всичко за виното

Кой е на линия

Потребители разглеждащи този форум: 0 регистрирани и 2 госта